Facebook ends its interim period which is a good thing
AND
Share
I quickly noted here and here that Facebook was in its interim period.
That period lasted for half a year from March 2009 to October 2009.
This is the visualization of the shift in Facebook’s direction.

What was Facebook intention for moving toward content in the first place
- Experiments for innovation. Even Mark was surprised that web games was loved so well
- Competition with Twitter
Why the move back in October 2009 makes sense
Firstly, the most Facebook can be is a content aggregator and hosting, not a critical content creation platform. Holding the position on the content side is not sustainable.
Secondly, content on Facebook serves the purpose of building relationship. The key is still relationship. Abandoning relationship to be on the content extremity was not sustainable either.
The gap
The shift to maintain balance between relationship and content leaves creates a gap between Facebook itself and its clones. e.g. Zing Me
Connect to me:
- Follow me on Twitter: @taitran
- Connect to me on Facebook: taitran.com/facebook
- Connect to me on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/taitran
- Follow me on LinkHay (Vietnamese): linkhay/u/TaiTran






You mean this interface was changed recently is Facebook’s shift to relationship ? I think integrate Highlight and News feed (before) is a good idea, because it focus on social network core value : connections. However, who cares about someone is now friend with someone, and who join a group. My Live feed now is full of things I don’t care about, and I can’t hide them. And according to Mashable.com, many people hates new interface.
Those are things I do care. It’s simple that different people have different needs.
Sure, but if I can hide which I don’t care about is a good news.