Jul 28

Facebook vs. Orkut in Photo sharing

Category: How Products benefit users Add comments

I admit that what kept me on Facebook for so long is its ability to host photos. I’m really happy how Photos and Photo upload work in Facebook.

The only thing I don’t like about it is that it auto-resizes photos to 604px width.

I don’t use MySpace, unfortunately.

The third most popular social networking site is Orkut, and I have some friends there.

I’ll just make a comparison on my most frequently used feature: Photo sharing.

Service Quantity Limit Capacity Limit Resize Allowed formats Tagging
Facebook Unlimited albums
60 photos per album		 None Width 604px JPG, PNG, GIF Yes,
with better usability
Orkut 10,000 photos
100 photos per album		 None Width 800px JPG, PNG, GIF Yes

Enjoyed this entry? Register to receive FREE updates via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner





Tags of this article: ,,,,,,,,.


Last update July 28, 2008

Digg this post | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google |
Post to Reddit | Post to Slashdot Submit to Netscape | Post to Furl | Post to Spurl | Post to Rawsugar | Submit to Newsvine |
Post to Simpy Post to Tailrank | Smark this post | Fark this post | Blogmark this post | Post to Scuttle | Feed this link |
Post to Blinklist | Post to Wists Post to Blinkbits | Post to Connotea | Post to Netvouz | Post to Shadows | Post to linkagogo | Track co.mments of this post | Track comments of this page on ma.gnolia

Related Posts


  • Blogging in Facebook

  • Picasa integrated into Blogger

  • Facebook vs Orkut vs Yahoo! Mash vs MySpace, and some other Social Networking sites

  • Facebook added more privacy options

  • The day (social media) people fear is near: Facebook’s gonna launch in Vietnam


    • Email To Friend

    Print This Post



    Leave a Reply

    WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio