Tag

Category: How IT world operates 2 Comments »

1. What is Tag

1.1. Definition

A tag is a relevant keyword associated with a piece of information, thus describing the item and enabling keyword-based classification of information.

The piece of information can be files, web pages, images, bookmarks, or blog entries.

Typically, one item contains multiple tags.

Usually a tag contains a link to display all items associated with that tag.

1.2. Tagcloud

Tag Cloud

A tag cloud is a visual depiction of a collection of tags used on a collections of items. Often, more frequently used tags are more emphasized.

Display order of tag cloud can either be alphabetical, or sorted by popularity, or random.

A tag is frequently found on websites, but there is one good example of printed media that employs tag cloud: The Van Couversun, Wednesday January 3, 2007

1.3. Tag Folksonomy

A folksonomy describes a content that employs tags. Examples of folksonomy may include: del.icio.us, Flickr, MySpace, youtube…

Alternatively, folksonomy also describes a community using a service and navigating through information by following tags and giving tags to own data to help people find them.

Some services (Xanga, Wordpress) provide site-wide tag list while others (Blogger, Yahoo! 360) only give tag list of one owner.

Folksonomy is coined by 2 words ‘folks’ and ‘taxonomy’. ‘Taxonomy’ is from the Greek ‘taxis’ and ‘nomos’ which respectively mean ‘classify’ and ‘manage’. Folksonomy can be interpreted as ‘community classification management’.

2. What are Tags used for?

2.1. Searching

Tagging allows searching. Internet users can follow the link from a tag to retrieve all information associated to that tag.

2.2. Tag vs. Category

Categories allow classification. Tags also allow classification. How are they different?

For example, you write an article about:

“web design for web 2.0, exploiting glossy design style, with images created by Adobe Photoshop”

that article can be put under 2 categories: ‘Design’, ‘Photoshop’. Because these may be the mainstream of your website. The article can be assigned with tags like: ‘web-2.0′, ‘glossy’, ‘images’, ‘Adobe’, ‘web’, ‘web-design’, ‘Design’, ‘Photoshop’

  • Categories are more structurized and static | Tags are more liberal and continually added
  • Categories can have unique names | Tags need to be popular and used by many
  • Categories can have long names | Tags should have less than 3 words
  • Posts are usually in one to four categories | A single post can list many more tags (one Flickr photo is allow to contain 70 tags)
  • Categories are not tags | Tags can be used to replace categories
  • Categories define the mainstream of the website | Tags define the information in each item
  • Categories help visitors to get an idea what the website is about | Tags help visitors to find different items

2.3. Drawback

Inconsistency among authors
  • Different people may use different terms to identify one object.
    Example: some use ‘football’ and some use ’soccer’ to refer to one kind of sport. ‘lumber’ and ‘timber’ is another example
  • Plural and singular
    Example: ‘dog’ and ‘dogs’ are two different tags
  • Polysemy - words which have many meanings
    Example: ‘table’ can be a thing in the dining room or on the computer screen
  • Synonyms
    Example: television and TV
Inconsistency among items of one author
  • One person, at different times may give different tags to one object. For example, Bob wrote about a TV show and tagged it ‘television’. The day after, he wrote about another one and tagged it ‘tv’. Yet another day, he tagged his next post ‘TV show’.
  • Unpredictability: when one adds a new tag, she may discover that many previous posts may also be associated with that tag. Editing back can be a pain.

3. Giving smart Tags

3.1. Giving smart tags can do 3 things

  1. Boost visitors’ navigation: with commonly found tags, visitors save time to find the information they expect
  2. Push your wiki(search_engine) pagerank: when your tags match what internet users type in their wiki(search_engine), the possibility that your page appears on top results is higher
  3. Save time for regressive tag addition: when you predict a collection of tags you’re going to use, it will save time for you to add tags to previously posted entries

3.2. How to give smart tags

…or more accurately, find smart tags to give

  1. Compare the tags you’re planning to use to see which is more popular. This can be done by searching each keyword with Google to record the number of results returned. More efficiently, there are utilities that enable this: Go Rank
  2. Study how people tag by visiting popular tagging folksonomy

    Flickr Tag Cloud shot 7/7/2007

4. The ‘other’ Tags

Tag cloud inspiration

Ideas are expressed based on the presentation of a tag cloud depiction

Mind Map

Web 2.0 mind map, Markus Angermeier ,November 11, 2005)

Fun Web 2.0 Logo Cloud

  • Fun Web 2.0 Logo Cloud

The outdoor tag game

Tag is a playground game that usually involves two or more players attempting to “tag” other players by touching them with their hands. It may be made more complex with various rule modifications.

The self-writing tag game

Anyone who is tagged by a friend is to write a number of truths about her/himself, then continue to tag other friends.

The secret tag game

Anyone who is tagged needs to tag three other friends before s/he can read the “secret message” left by the tagger.

Read more here

Reference

Lorelle on Wordpress




Tags of this article: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.


Last update July 6, 2007

Related Posts


  • No related posts
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    Interaction with Web 2.0

    Category: How IT world operates No Comments »

    Confucius says something in the image, but this did not to load

    Intro

    When I first heard of “Web 2.0″, my expectation was a new standard of World Wide Web. The usage of the term failed me, as Web 2.0 points me to what happen on the surface - user interaction and collaboration.

    Web 2.0 roughly defined

    Web 2.0 is not a new version of WWW. It refers to a phenomenal shift from centralized information authoring to a platform that enables end-users to interactively create, maintain and share contents.

    Components

    Web 2.0 characteristics. This image did not load

    Mistakably Web 2.0 is used to describe relatively new forms of communication via the web:

    • Weblog
    • Social network
    • Wiki
    • wiki(RSS)
    • Social bookmark

    However, it coverage is much larger. Comparing to the definition, the following are also part of Web 2.0

    • Instant Messaging
    • Text chat
    • Forum
    • Real-time editors
    • Search engines

    This is not an exhaustive list though, as new trends continuously emerge at the time this entry is written.

    Characteristics

    Glossy Web 2.0 design. This image did not load

    • Open communication
    • Information sharing and reuse
    • Many-to-many authoring
    • Publishing methods that requires less technical expertise
    • User-centered
    • Endless evolving. This is what “Beta” is for

    Technology

    Ajax was coined in February 2005, and has been widely equated to the technology that enables Web 2.0. In fact, features that Ajax has to offer had been initiated earlier. Microsoft Remote Scripting, which exploits Java Applet was a good start, then XMLhttpRequest flourished in Microsoft Exchange Server.

    M$ did it at the first time, how did Ajax gain the fame? The answer might lie in its open nature. The Web community collaborated to develop, apply and reuse the technique. ‘Open’ and ‘community’ are the key traits of Web 2.0, it is no wonder why Ajax has become that popular.

    Technically, Ajax is not a technology in itself, but a group of related technologies:

    • XHTML
    • CSS
    • JavaScript
    • XMLhttpRequest
    • XML

    My experience

    My first experience with Ajax was July 2005 in a vbb forum. Although having been working with Microsoft Exchange Server for a long time, I couldn’t help a Wow. The wiki(usability) of the technology means very much to me as a web user. The sad reason is justified in the next section.

    My first experience with Web 2.0-in-definition traced back to 2002, when I first used Yahoo! Messenger and Yahoo! Photos. Y!M opened up new horizons for me.

    Pleasure

    More than sharing and collaborating, Web 2.0 satisfies one dramatic desire of its users: ego affirmation. The virtual freedom of speech and the power of customization bring in the magic for laymen to lay their hands on creating and embracing their ‘I’ over the net by creating auxiliary identities.

    Accept it or not, even ones who claim to pronounce what they want, or that they are wearing no mask are consumed by their own idealism, if not subconscious deluding.

    Digital Divide

    Einstein says something in the image, but this did not to load

    Vietnam International Internet connection bandwidth is so narrow it hurts.

    Conclusion

    Being abused, misunderstood, misused, Web 2.0 stands as an innovative evolution of Internet usage. While criticized to not being a deliberate advancement of technology, it completely revolutes the way users interact with the Web in the way it should have been, and proves the rationale of the rigid-free online business models. Web 2.0 enables collaboration, preserves and shares information and knowledge, brings business opportunities, enhances productivity, and encourages online practice of democracy.

    Examples

    Instant Messaging

    Yahoo! Messenger
    Gtalk
    ICQ
    MSN Messenger

    Blogs

    Blogspot
    Wordpress
    live.com
    360.yahoo.com

    Social networks

    MySpace
    Xanga
    hi5

    Forums

    Photo sharing sites

    flickr.com
    imageshack.us
    photobucket.com
    picasaweb.google.com
    slide.com

    File sharing sites

    rapidshare.de
    rapidshare.com
    megaupload.com
    streamload.com

    Wikis

    wikipedia.org
    citizendium.org

    Search Engines

    google.com

    Real-time editors

    Google notebook
    Google Doc
    Google Spreadsheet

    Social Bookmarks

    digg.com
    reddit.com
    del.icio.us

    Reference

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2




    Tags of this article: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.


    Last update April 14, 2007

    Related Posts


  • Web 2.0 - the Machine is Us/ing Us

  • CommunicatioN, not CommunicationS

  • New interface of VNExpress.net

  • GUI Design for Enterprise Systems

  • 5 steps to Make Profits from your Customer Supports
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio