Information R/evolution

Category: How IT world operates 1 Comment »

Information is:

  • A thing
  • Belongs to its Category
  • and stored in a File

Dare to challenge these facts assumptions? Please watch this video:




Tags of this article: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.


Last update December 22, 2007

Related Posts


  • CyVee’s Concern of Security conflicts with its Account Levels

  • yUp.vn opens Beta

  • Bikini Methodology of Sale

  • 5 ways to build effective Wikis

  • Semantic Web - a Nightmare on Paradise?
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    Potential problems with Trait tests

    Category: How to better Communication No Comments »

    Entrepreneurial 360 Assessment

    Problems with Trait tests mis-use

    Firstly, many of them cover self-assessment. As depicted in the “360 assessment” illustration, self-assessment alone is never, and far from enough. How good self-assessment results are depends on their self-awareness.

    Next, using these tests for what they were not intended for may invite counter effects. Trait tests were designed to guide rather than to judge, they give more information on preferences than on abilities. They help people to identify their potentials; they are not to identify people’s capabilities. They are great in creating and maintaining healthy relationships, but they are not an excuse for relationship termination

    Furthermore, when seeing test result of a person, you’re seeing a snapshot of that person together with his mental and probably physical conditions. People are not static, but dynamic and growing, fluctuating with dreams, visions and aspirations.

    Applying Trait tests without credentials of ethical and appropriate use might come as another question. A lot of tests rely heavily on interpretation and the results can be trusted as the level of trust placed upon the reader.

    Besides, many assessments have a little something for everyone. People are not totally black or white, but tend to have a mixture of different, degree varying, personalities. Test-takers are tempted to to seriously overestimate the degree to which general statements can fit them uniquely.

    Finally, categorization, or fitting dynamic people into pre-defined frames can become an abuse, one one should be fully aware not to overuse or takes the risk of being misled.

    Notes when applying Trait tests

    • Adaptation is required for the tests to comply with the enterprise’s culture and sociological factors
    • When invest in using Trait tests, do so seriously and stressing the importance and complexity of these tests. Overall, they are definitely not for idle times, but require full research and occupation.



    Tags of this article: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.


    Last update July 26, 2007

    Related Posts


  • CPM Advertising comes to Vietnam market

  • 5 ways to build effective Wikis

  • Bikini Methodology of Sale

  • ThanhNien Online’s New Design

  • Use Case is micro element of Best Practice
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    Tag

    Category: How IT world operates 2 Comments »

    1. What is Tag

    1.1. Definition

    A tag is a relevant keyword associated with a piece of information, thus describing the item and enabling keyword-based classification of information.

    The piece of information can be files, web pages, images, bookmarks, or blog entries.

    Typically, one item contains multiple tags.

    Usually a tag contains a link to display all items associated with that tag.

    1.2. Tagcloud

    Tag Cloud

    A tag cloud is a visual depiction of a collection of tags used on a collections of items. Often, more frequently used tags are more emphasized.

    Display order of tag cloud can either be alphabetical, or sorted by popularity, or random.

    A tag is frequently found on websites, but there is one good example of printed media that employs tag cloud: The Van Couversun, Wednesday January 3, 2007

    1.3. Tag Folksonomy

    A folksonomy describes a content that employs tags. Examples of folksonomy may include: del.icio.us, Flickr, MySpace, youtube…

    Alternatively, folksonomy also describes a community using a service and navigating through information by following tags and giving tags to own data to help people find them.

    Some services (Xanga, Wordpress) provide site-wide tag list while others (Blogger, Yahoo! 360) only give tag list of one owner.

    Folksonomy is coined by 2 words ‘folks’ and ‘taxonomy’. ‘Taxonomy’ is from the Greek ‘taxis’ and ‘nomos’ which respectively mean ‘classify’ and ‘manage’. Folksonomy can be interpreted as ‘community classification management’.

    2. What are Tags used for?

    2.1. Searching

    Tagging allows searching. Internet users can follow the link from a tag to retrieve all information associated to that tag.

    2.2. Tag vs. Category

    Categories allow classification. Tags also allow classification. How are they different?

    For example, you write an article about:

    “web design for web 2.0, exploiting glossy design style, with images created by Adobe Photoshop”

    that article can be put under 2 categories: ‘Design’, ‘Photoshop’. Because these may be the mainstream of your website. The article can be assigned with tags like: ‘web-2.0′, ‘glossy’, ‘images’, ‘Adobe’, ‘web’, ‘web-design’, ‘Design’, ‘Photoshop’

    • Categories are more structurized and static | Tags are more liberal and continually added
    • Categories can have unique names | Tags need to be popular and used by many
    • Categories can have long names | Tags should have less than 3 words
    • Posts are usually in one to four categories | A single post can list many more tags (one Flickr photo is allow to contain 70 tags)
    • Categories are not tags | Tags can be used to replace categories
    • Categories define the mainstream of the website | Tags define the information in each item
    • Categories help visitors to get an idea what the website is about | Tags help visitors to find different items

    2.3. Drawback

    Inconsistency among authors
    • Different people may use different terms to identify one object.
      Example: some use ‘football’ and some use ’soccer’ to refer to one kind of sport. ‘lumber’ and ‘timber’ is another example
    • Plural and singular
      Example: ‘dog’ and ‘dogs’ are two different tags
    • Polysemy - words which have many meanings
      Example: ‘table’ can be a thing in the dining room or on the computer screen
    • Synonyms
      Example: television and TV
    Inconsistency among items of one author
    • One person, at different times may give different tags to one object. For example, Bob wrote about a TV show and tagged it ‘television’. The day after, he wrote about another one and tagged it ‘tv’. Yet another day, he tagged his next post ‘TV show’.
    • Unpredictability: when one adds a new tag, she may discover that many previous posts may also be associated with that tag. Editing back can be a pain.

    3. Giving smart Tags

    3.1. Giving smart tags can do 3 things

    1. Boost visitors’ navigation: with commonly found tags, visitors save time to find the information they expect
    2. Push your wiki(search_engine) pagerank: when your tags match what internet users type in their wiki(search_engine), the possibility that your page appears on top results is higher
    3. Save time for regressive tag addition: when you predict a collection of tags you’re going to use, it will save time for you to add tags to previously posted entries

    3.2. How to give smart tags

    …or more accurately, find smart tags to give

    1. Compare the tags you’re planning to use to see which is more popular. This can be done by searching each keyword with Google to record the number of results returned. More efficiently, there are utilities that enable this: Go Rank
    2. Study how people tag by visiting popular tagging folksonomy

      Flickr Tag Cloud shot 7/7/2007

    4. The ‘other’ Tags

    Tag cloud inspiration

    Ideas are expressed based on the presentation of a tag cloud depiction

    Mind Map

    Web 2.0 mind map, Markus Angermeier ,November 11, 2005)

    Fun Web 2.0 Logo Cloud

    • Fun Web 2.0 Logo Cloud

    The outdoor tag game

    Tag is a playground game that usually involves two or more players attempting to “tag” other players by touching them with their hands. It may be made more complex with various rule modifications.

    The self-writing tag game

    Anyone who is tagged by a friend is to write a number of truths about her/himself, then continue to tag other friends.

    The secret tag game

    Anyone who is tagged needs to tag three other friends before s/he can read the “secret message” left by the tagger.

    Read more here

    Reference

    Lorelle on Wordpress




    Tags of this article: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.


    Last update July 6, 2007

    Related Posts


  • No related posts
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio