Organizational Structure education for high school students in Hanoi Vietnam

Category: How Career is developed 1 Comment »

High school of Foreign Languages, a member of National University Hanoi introduced a new class structure for students.

Read the story here

Summary: classes are groups into Houses which resemble Hogwarts Houses from the novel series “Harry Potter”. The name of the Houses are oriental holy creatures which protect the country: Thanh Long (Oriental Green Dragon), Bạch Hổ (White Tiger), Chu Tước (Oriental Phoenix), Huyền Vũ (Tortoise).

***

This model is an interesting when we look into details.

Originally, there are a number of classes.

Organization

Because they major in different languages, students doing the same major naturally share closer bond between one another to those doing different major.

For instance, students from English class 1, English class 2, English class 3 and English class 4 are usually closer to one another than an English student is to a Russian student.

This forms Career Orientation in these students.

Students from different major might want to prepare themselves for their careers in different ways. A rough scenario might be: German major students may want to acquire domain knowledge on heavy industries, telecommunications while Chinese major students might way to know much about trading and consumer goods industry.

Organization

What the school is doing is: group different classes into Houses, each House consists of classes doing all different majors.

For instance, the Green Dragon House could consist of English 1, French 1, Russian 1, Chinese 1, German 1, Japanese 1; the Phoenix Dragon could consist of English 2, French 2, Russian 2, Chinese 2, German 2, Japanese 2… and so on.

Organization

The benefit of this model is that it resembles real life organizational structure.

In an organization, people with same expertise form a Group of Expertise. However, different individuals are usually put together to form a Team to achieve certain goals.

For example: In a Software company, there should be Project Managers, Product Managers, Software Architects, Business Analysts, System Analysts, Consultants, Software Designers, Implementers, Graphical Designers, Testers… This forms Career Paths.

Different individuals then assigned to form a Project Team which consists of different people playing roles. This establishes Organizational Divisions.

Theoretically, Project Managers should gather in either both formal or informal meetings to share their experience in managing projects. Similarly, Consultants should also share their lessons in consultancy skills with one another. The same for Testers with testing skills. While a Project Manager can provide certain on-the-job guidance for beginning Testers, it is usually better if knowledge sharing and mentoring is done from Tester to Tester.

Career Path is vertical. Organizational Division is horizontal. Organizational Division makes sure the organization achieves its objectives by combining the skills of different resources. Career Path ensures the growth of individuals within a company, knowledge management and organizational expertise.

Let’s get back to High school of Foreign Languages Hanoi. The new organization structure should equip the students with knowledge of organizational behavior, team work and collaboration and thus prepare them to work for organizations later on.




Tags of this article: ,,,,,,.


Last update November 30, 2008

Related Posts


  • @ngoisao.edu.vn and why this is a good thing

  • RMIT Student Leadership Award, Gold Standard

  • Became member of Golden Key International Honour Society

  • Facebook added more privacy options

  • Business lessons from Keangnam Vina, observed through the Request of Commitment
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    Article-based Classifications of Message Transmission

    Category: How to better Communication No Comments »

    I hereby model a message delivery as an article. If a conversation/talk/speech were an article, how differently would people communicate?

    The sample article

    Let’s take a random article as an example.

    Sample Article

    The Heading-only style

    Heading Only
    The communication from this style only conveys the headings of the article. The communicator possibly either doesn’t want to spend more time explaining in details or expects the audience to understand upon hearing the titles.

    Advantages

    • Time-saving

    Disadvantages

    • Huh? What next?

    The Wiki style


    Lambrusco

    Some of you may have heard me preach of lambrusco, the foaming, almost purple sparkling wine from the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy.

    No, not the semi-sweet fizzy stuff that was so popular in the 1970s, but the real, dry, earthy lambrusco, from producers like Medici Ermete, Vini, Vittorio Graziano and Villa di Carlo. Served icy cold, it’s wonderful with just about any simple dish, be it fried chicken or pizza or burgers.

    But you say you want a real wine (as if lambrusco weren’t real enough)? You say you want an American wine because it is, after all, practically the Fourth of July?

    Description

    This style is exactly like a wiki page. The communicator mentions keywords of the article, with or without priority order. Each of the keyword then links to a whole concept from other sources.

    For example, when the speaker mentions “organizational behavior”, s/he could point to a book on the topic and recommend her/his audience to read the book.

    Advantages

    • Inter-connections of information
    • From the spoken conversation, the receivers can then search for the more details with the keywords from the message

    Disadvantages

    • Some audience who have not known the concepts might lose track of the information mid-way

    The Ad-hoc style

    Adhoc

    The communicator randomly picks paragraphs from the article and give full details of the paragraphs without or with limited conclusion.

    Next time: full details of another random paragraph.

    Advantages

    • The audience might extract the right information in details if asking the right question.

    Disadvantages

    • Very hard to assemble the comprehensive but scattered information into a complete article.

    The Bottom-up style

    Bottom up

    Throw the conclusion on first, then explain if questioned.

    Advantages

    • Just straight to the point. Exceeding time doesn’t impact much as the audience has already caught (if so) what they need.

    Disadvantages

    • Surprise for unprepared audience

    The Full-article style

    Full Article

    Section by section, paragraph by paragraph, word by word till the end.

    Advantages

    • Every full details

    Disadvantages

    • Time consumption

    Conclusion

    What is your style?

    What other styles do you add to this list?

    What style do you choose for which situation?

    Reference

    The sample article is taken from The New York Times’ Reds on Ice? It’s Not Heresy




    Tags of this article: ,,,,,,,,,.


    Last update July 3, 2008

    Related Posts


  • Reflective Listening on net-based threaded communication

  • Yahoo! Mail 2007 shortcuts

  • How Good is an Online Article

  • Tai Tran’s Lab: Technology As Innovator is back

  • How to: get the most out of an article
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    Web 2.0 - the Machine is Us/ing Us

    Category: How IT world operates No Comments »

    Web 2.0 services

    This video is brilliant!

    Michael Wesch did well to synthesize the evolution of web 2.0 from a researcher’s point of view, yet totally easy to understand to average web users.

    What original about this movie are the 2 factors

    1. The video is so lively that the whole world of web 2.0 version 2007 flashes in front of our eyes: XML, Google’s, Yahoo!’s, netvibes, YouTube, del.ico.us, digg, Wikipedia…
    2. A reminder: We need to rethink identity, ethics, governance, commerce, love, ourselves…

    ==> See my previous post on web 2.0




    Tags of this article: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.


    Last update May 8, 2007

    Related Posts


  • So many English words!

  • Taking notes remotely, securely, and in style
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio