Sep 02
(to-be-read in reverse-chronicle order)
3 September 2008
Positive review: SaigonNezumi, Google Chrome - What a browser should be -> Simple
A nice coverage: Chip 2.0, Review after the first day launching Chrome
Not-so-positive review: Google Chrome, it’s not worth the Buzz
Why Google Chrome is not only a cost-saving basket
On Finance’s side: GOOG’s Chrome is all about Wall Street.
TaiTran’s comment: Chrome is only only a cost-saving basket, but a full house for wealth for Google.
- OK, the money that Google is saving as depicted in Zdnet’s article is the kitchen.
- Chrome knows all your web activities. Google will sell smarter ads and thus their revenue from ads will increase. This is the bedroom.
- Chrome is the O/S for the web
Recall: what’s the 2 most successful properties of Microsoft? Windows and Office
Has Google got Office? Absolutely. Now Chrome is Google’s Operating System.
This is the living room.
- Chrome being open-source will attract the communities (many from Mozilla) who will work for Chrome (more accurately, GOOG) for credit rather than wages. This is the bath room.
- Chrome will be the web platform on which many applications and SaaS will base on: free dependency is never a free lunch. This is the dining room.
- Chrome being very light will integrate deeply with Android for penetrating into Mobile market. This is the garden.
In short, all about making money in the long run, given that Chrome will succeed. How successful do you think Chrome will be?
Testing Chrome
- Is faster than FF3
- Failed to import bookmarks from my FF3
- Offers more free space by pushing the tab bar to the very top
- Doesn’t destroy the layout when zoom in. This is both good and bad.
- Doesn’t display XML correctly
- Supports built-in 48 languages
- Connects to Google services at full speed
- Uses same web standard with Firefox
- Provides context-sensitive status bar
- No RSS auto-detectio
- No support for Quick Time
- AdBlock will be highly political
- Smart start page: recently visited sites
- Flickr “Web upload” does not work
- The address bar is a search bar
- Facebook and Zoho Javascript errors
Chrome About Pages
1 September 2008
Google’s official announcement: we hit “send” a bit early on a comic book
Tad was skeptical with 7 reasons why Chrome is a bad idea
Technologizer raised 10 questions
Agglom scanned the catoon
Google Blogoscoped threw the first bomb

Tags of this article: apple,browser,chrome,firefox,free,google,open-source,web,web-2.0,web-3.0,webkits,website.
Last update September 2, 2008
Related Posts
Localization must allow option to International versionGoogle Free ServicesRMIT Coat of ArmsWebnerations: From Web Service to Web Platform, and how their Business Models evolveCan’t find on Google
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 18
I’m on Firefox 3 too, and I utilize addons to enrich my web experience too, like most of you there.
There have been countless of entries to useful Firefox addons, but what’s different about this post is that it measures the costs that can be saved for users when using these extensions.
What are the costs of usability and how much are they?
The descending order of severity of the costs are
- Screen loads: this is a pain when internet connection is slow. It usually takes most time of all interactions with the computer
- Mouse movements: mouse movements severely damage the wrist and this should be minimized
- Mouse clicks: mouse clicks are less severe than mouse movements, but are also expensive
- URLs: an URL takes time to type in
- Enters: it hurts the little finger
- Hot keys: hot keys usually consists of at least 2 keys, but are regarded as less expensive than Enters because they are mostly done with the left hand, reduces damage to the right hand
Now, let’s start with the addons!
The first six in the batch: Google Toolbar, Diigo Toolbar, StumbleUpon Toolbar, TwitterFox, CustomizeGoogle, Better YouTube
Google Toolbar provides search, “I’m feeling lucky” and images search functions without having to go to Google.com
It also supports Gmail notifications and Google PR check
|
If I don’t use this addon |
If I use this addon |
| Costs |
- Ctrl+T
- Alt+D
- Input: google.com/ncr or images.google.com
- Enter
- Wait for one screen load
- Enter
- Input search keywords. Enter
- Wait for one screen load
|
- Move mouse to the toolbar
- Input search keywords
- Enter or move mouse to “Search the Web for images”
- Wait for one screen load
|
| Cost saved |
|
- One screen load
- Two hot keys
- One URL
- Enters
- This can save me 10 seconds
|
I have used Diigo as a replacement of delicious (I still love the old brand del.icio.us)
Though delicious tagging is smarter and usability is better, Diigo supports web-highlighting which makes it an advantage.
Diigo toolbar allows user to bookmark their favorite web pages for later reference. With Diigo, all bookmarks are centralized when users move from computer to another.
|
If I don’t use this addon |
If I use this addon |
| Costs |
- Alt+D to move cursor to the address bar
- Ctrl+C to copy the link to post
- Ctrl+T
- Alt+D
- Input: diigo
- Enter
- Wait for one screen load
- Move mouse to “My Bookmarks”
- Click
- Wait for one screen
- Move mouse to “Add a bookmark”
- Ctrl+V
- Enter
- Move mouse to “Tags” (assume that I ignore “Description”)
- Input tags
- Move mouse to “Add New Bookmark”
- Click
|
- Move mouse to the “Bookmark” button
- Click
- Input tags
- Click
|
| Cost saved |
|
This can save me 60 seconds |
StumbleUpon works on an interesting concept: when you hit the Stumble! button, the addon takes you to a random interesting page that matches your preferences.
The StumbleUpon toolbar makes it more convenient for you.
|
If I don’t use this addon |
If I use this addon |
| Costs |
- Alt+D to move cursor to the address bar
- Ctrl+C to copy the link to post
- Ctrl+T
- Alt+D
- Input: diigo
- Enter
- Wait for one screen load
- Move mouse to “Post new blog”
- Ctrl+V
- Move mouse to “Post new blog” button
- Click
|
- Move mouse to the “I like it!” button
- Click
|
| Cost saved |
|
This can save me 45 seconds |
This powerful addon modifies Google search results and display preferences. It supports options for Web Search, Images, Groups, News, Products, G Answers, G Books, Gmail, G Galendar, G Maps, G Docs, Video, Reader, Cache, Blogger, History, Privacy and Filter
|
If I don’t use this addon |
If I use this addon |
| Costs |
From Google Images Search screen
- Move mouse to the thumbnail
- Right-click to open context menu
- T
- Ctrl+Tab
- Wait for half a screen load (only need the thumbnail to be loaded)
- Move mouse to the thumbnail
- Click
- Wait for one screen load
|
From Google Images Search screen
- Move mouse to the thumbnail
- Right-click to open context menu
- T
- Ctrl+Tab
- Wait for one screen load
|
| Cost saved |
|
- Half a screen load
- One Click
- This can save me 30 seconds
|
|
If I don’t use this addon |
If I use this addon |
| Costs |
- Ctrl+T
- Input twitter.com
- Enter
- Wait for one screen load
|
- Move mouse to the Twitterfox icon
- Click
- Wait for one mini-screen load
|
| Cost saved |
|
This looks like it costs even more than the web version. However, the time to load the mini-screen is much less than it does to load the full web page |
This Greasemonkey-based addon loads the YouTube video faster and allows downloading the video. Generally it saves me half an hour per day for one video.
Conclusion
With the intensity of these service I use everyday, these addons easily save at least one hour each day for me.
I can use this one hour for other business purposes which can generate other benefits.
What is your experience? What do you think of my approach when analyzing these?
Tags of this article: addon,address,bookmark,browser,cost-saving,diigo,extension,firefox,gmail,google,images,pr,screen,search,search-engine,social-bookmark,software,stumbleupon,toolbar,twitter,usability,web,youtube.
Last update August 18, 2008
Related Posts
Does Safari have what Firefox doesn’t?Webnerations: From Web Service to Web Platform, and how their Business Models evolveRead Full Articles for More FunctionalitiesTest your Website on different Browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari, Opera, Konqueror) and Operating Systems (Windows, Linux, Mac)Freeware Only!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 13
Online advertising in Vietnam has long been in its first step when banner was the dominating method. Interstitial were used in some tech-savvy sites.
The market of 20 million Internet users has been regarded as very potential. We have seen the emergence of many sites on various areas such as blog platform, portal, social networking, C2C trading, online media, news sharing. Further down for each area many niches have been spotted. Each player does have her own strategy of monetization.
Out of all these movements, I’ve wondered if an advertising system like one of Google AdSense would ever be introduced in Vietnam.
When looking around, I spotted this site: XpressMedia of VinaForce.
From the first glance, the product-naming Game endorses CPM Advertising.
This model’s potential
Let’s see the potential of the market here in Vietnam:
- 20 million internet users
- Approximately 2.5 blogs
- Growing product-savvy
These factors form firm foundation for the development of this model.
One important thing to remember at the Vietnam market is not hasten to introduce ‘advanced’ functionalities. Simple and easy to understand is the way to go. We’ll see whether this model will make it here.
What do you think of XpressMedia first Game?
Tags of this article: advertising,development,google,monetization,potential,vietnam,web.
Last update July 13, 2008
Related Posts
VCCorp and expert content composition in VietnamIt doesn’t look like McDonald will come to Vietnam… soonInspiration for SaleNow that Yahoo! 360 will officially be closed, where will you move your blog and friends to?Google services officially in Vietnam, eventually. Why and how?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Comments