WordPress Publishing Tips - 3

Category: How to better WordPress writing 4 Comments »

WordPress badges

target=”_blank”

…because you don’t want people to leave your page when they click a link.

People don’t want to leave a page when they haven’t finished reading either.

Describe your link and explicitly say “Click here”

Quality Example Analysis
Bad URL Ambiguous. Reader doesn’t know what the URL contains
Not so bad Tai Tran’s Lab Offers the title of the link, but is still general
Good Tai Tran’s Lab where you can find information on business and technology Offers title and description of the link
Better Click here to Tai Tran’s Lab to read information on business and technology Clear instruction of what readers should do: Click
Very bad This link is super cooool. It’s the best! Click here everyone! Ambiguous & childish

Throw your RSS subscription options out

  • For tech-savvy readers, RSS icon is all they need. Show off this in an easy-to-spot place
  • For non tech-savvy readers, offer email subscription at the end of an entry. Since around 85% traffic comes from search / social media, readers normally jump right in one post of yours and you want to keep them by offering them the option when they finish their reading.
  • To many who are not familiar with RSS subscription, the word “Subscribe” sounds like they’re being charged to receive service. Make it clear to them that subscription is free.

Previous posts

Click here to read the first 4 tips in the series.

Click here to read the next 4 tips in the series.




Tags of this article: ,,,,,.


Last update September 4, 2008

Related Posts


  • WordPress Publishing Tips - 2

  • Microsoft Word 2007 provides Blog Publishing functionality

  • WordPress Publishing Tips - 1

  • Google Free Services

  • Post YouTube video on hosted WordPress blog
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    Article-based Classifications of Message Transmission

    Category: How to better Communication No Comments »

    I hereby model a message delivery as an article. If a conversation/talk/speech were an article, how differently would people communicate?

    The sample article

    Let’s take a random article as an example.

    Sample Article

    The Heading-only style

    Heading Only
    The communication from this style only conveys the headings of the article. The communicator possibly either doesn’t want to spend more time explaining in details or expects the audience to understand upon hearing the titles.

    Advantages

    • Time-saving

    Disadvantages

    • Huh? What next?

    The Wiki style


    Lambrusco

    Some of you may have heard me preach of lambrusco, the foaming, almost purple sparkling wine from the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy.

    No, not the semi-sweet fizzy stuff that was so popular in the 1970s, but the real, dry, earthy lambrusco, from producers like Medici Ermete, Vini, Vittorio Graziano and Villa di Carlo. Served icy cold, it’s wonderful with just about any simple dish, be it fried chicken or pizza or burgers.

    But you say you want a real wine (as if lambrusco weren’t real enough)? You say you want an American wine because it is, after all, practically the Fourth of July?

    Description

    This style is exactly like a wiki page. The communicator mentions keywords of the article, with or without priority order. Each of the keyword then links to a whole concept from other sources.

    For example, when the speaker mentions “organizational behavior”, s/he could point to a book on the topic and recommend her/his audience to read the book.

    Advantages

    • Inter-connections of information
    • From the spoken conversation, the receivers can then search for the more details with the keywords from the message

    Disadvantages

    • Some audience who have not known the concepts might lose track of the information mid-way

    The Ad-hoc style

    Adhoc

    The communicator randomly picks paragraphs from the article and give full details of the paragraphs without or with limited conclusion.

    Next time: full details of another random paragraph.

    Advantages

    • The audience might extract the right information in details if asking the right question.

    Disadvantages

    • Very hard to assemble the comprehensive but scattered information into a complete article.

    The Bottom-up style

    Bottom up

    Throw the conclusion on first, then explain if questioned.

    Advantages

    • Just straight to the point. Exceeding time doesn’t impact much as the audience has already caught (if so) what they need.

    Disadvantages

    • Surprise for unprepared audience

    The Full-article style

    Full Article

    Section by section, paragraph by paragraph, word by word till the end.

    Advantages

    • Every full details

    Disadvantages

    • Time consumption

    Conclusion

    What is your style?

    What other styles do you add to this list?

    What style do you choose for which situation?

    Reference

    The sample article is taken from The New York Times’ Reds on Ice? It’s Not Heresy




    Tags of this article: ,,,,,,,,,.


    Last update July 3, 2008

    Related Posts


  • Reflective Listening on net-based threaded communication

  • Yahoo! Mail 2007 shortcuts

  • How Good is an Online Article

  • Tai Tran’s Lab: Technology As Innovator is back

  • How to: get the most out of an article
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    Preparing to write for Google Knol

    Category: How Products benefit users No Comments »

    Preparing to Knol

    Encouraging people to contribute knowledge

    Udi Manber, VP Engineering, Google

    The web contains an enormous amount of information, and Google has helped to make that information more easily accessible by providing pretty good search facilities. But not everything is written nor is everything well organized to make it easily discoverable. There are millions of people who possess useful knowledge that they would love to share, and there are billions of people who can benefit from it. We believe that many do not share that knowledge today simply because it is not easy enough to do that. The challenge posed to us by Larry, Sergey and Eric was to find a way to help people share their knowledge. This is our main goal.

    Earlier this week, we started inviting a selected group of people to try a new, free tool that we are calling “knol”, which stands for a unit of knowledge. Our goal is to encourage people who know a particular subject to write an authoritative article about it. The tool is still in development and this is just the first phase of testing. For now, using it is by invitation only. But we wanted to share with everyone the basic premises and goals behind this project.

    The key idea behind the knol project is to highlight authors. Books have authors’ names right on the cover, news articles have bylines, scientific articles always have authors — but somehow the web evolved without a strong standard to keep authors names highlighted. We believe that knowing who wrote what will significantly help users make better use of web content. At the heart, a knol is just a web page; we use the word “knol” as the name of the project and as an instance of an article interchangeably. It is well-organized, nicely presented, and has a distinct look and feel, but it is still just a web page. Google will provide easy-to-use tools for writing, editing, and so on, and it will provide free hosting of the content. Writers only need to write; we’ll do the rest.

    A knol on a particular topic is meant to be the first thing someone who searches for this topic for the first time will want to read. The goal is for knols to cover all topics, from scientific concepts, to medical information, from geographical and historical, to entertainment, from product information, to how-to-fix-it instructions. Google will not serve as an editor in any way, and will not bless any content. All editorial responsibilities and control will rest with the authors. We hope that knols will include the opinions and points of view of the authors who will put their reputation on the line. Anyone will be free to write. For many topics, there will likely be competing knols on the same subject. Competition of ideas is a good thing.

    Knols will include strong community tools. People will be able to submit comments, questions, edits, additional content, and so on. Anyone will be able to rate a knol or write a review of it. Knols will also include references and links to additional information. At the discretion of the author, a knol may include ads. If an author chooses to include ads, Google will provide the author with substantial revenue share from the proceeds of those ads.

    Once testing is completed, participation in knols will be completely open, and we cannot expect that all of them will be of high quality. Our job in Search Quality will be to rank the knols appropriately when they appear in Google search results. We are quite experienced with ranking web pages, and we feel confident that we will be up to the challenge. We are very excited by the potential to substantially increase the dissemination of knowledge.

    We do not want to build a walled garden of content; we want to disseminate it as widely as possible. Google will not ask for any exclusivity on any of this content and will make that content available to any other search engine.

    As always, a picture is worth a thousands words, so an example of a knol is below (double-click on the image to see the page in full). The main content is real, and we encourage you to read it (you may sleep better afterwards!), but most of the meta-data — like reviews, ratings, and comments — are not real, because, of course, this has not been in the public eye as yet. Again, this is a preliminary version.

    Source: Google Official Blog

    Google Knol screenshot

    Click on the image for the full-sized screenshot




    Tags of this article: ,,,,,,.


    Last update December 19, 2007

    Related Posts


  • Google Knol provides another channel / platform, rather than depresses current ones

  • Google Free Services

  • Can’t find on Google

  • Picasa integrated into Blogger

  • Tips for Linking to Google Presentations
  • Digg this post | Post to Reddit | Post this post to del.icio.us | Favorite this post on Technorati | Stumble Upon this post | Bookmark on Yahoo! | Share on Facebook | Bookmark on Google

    WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio